The Darwinism of the tech food chain

But this further clarifies the role of users in the Darwinian ecosystem. We are at the bottom of the food chain. We are, as has been described here so many times, mere hamsters spinning the wheels. The more hamsters and the more spinning means more dol…

But this further clarifies the role of users in the Darwinian ecosystem. We are at the bottom of the food chain. We are, as has been described here so many times, mere hamsters spinning the wheels. The more hamsters and the more spinning means more dollars for the beings higher-up the food chain. Unless.

Unless — we choose not to participate.

We’re going to do more in the coming weeks and months to define what we mean by “choose not to participate.” But just to begin, for vendors it means charging users a fair price for a service provided. And in return, a promise not to aggregate the users into a fine pink slime that can be reconstituted into billions of Facebook dollars. And for users, it means deciding that we’re creating more than just little dots of pink slime on Zuck’s social graph.интернет контент фильтр

Best Connected Individuals Are Not the Most Influential Spreaders in Social Networks

Another argument in favor of quality, versus quantity.

Amplify’d from www.technologyreview.com

The importance of hubs may have been overstated, say Kitsak and pals. “In contrast to common belief, the most influential spreaders in a social network do not correspond to the best connected people or to the most central people,” they say.

By contrast, “a less connected person who is strategically placed in the core of the network will have a significant effect that leads to dissemination through a large fraction of the population.”

Read more at www.technologyreview.com

 

копирайтер текстысео продвижение сайта самостоятельно